Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • ETSi DMS (through Tacker) - Toshi
    • OAI oDU to be instantiation through the ETSi Profile (Tacker)
    • Stretch : FM Data from the OAI oDU (TB Checked on API and workload)  if can be generated and captured by the Tacker (This is in-line to the Plugfest NA (Dec -2023) usecase).
      • Action 1 : Seshu to check with OAI team on the possibilities. ODU PTL (Ankit) to be checked for the example implemented in the OSC.
      •            2 :  Toshi  To discuss the E2E scope of this functionality. (Involve OAM)
    • PM Data would be a future scope  item.
      • 3GPP File based are already supported by RIC- John
      • Stream based is open - John. 
  • FOCOM - Seshu
  • NFO K8s Profile - Seshu
  • Recording:
    View file
    namevideo1481058530.mp4
    height150
    View file
    nameNF Orchestration Using SMO (Design details).pdf
    height150
    Image Added

2024-01-31:

J Release targets:

ETSI DMS profile enhancement.

https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/download/attachments/35881444/Tacker%20J-Release_for%20SMO_Jan_rev1.pptx?api=v2

K8s profile Integration to the SMO code - Draft.

...

SMO (FOCOM/NFO) functionality:

    1. Would the SMO be able to have the ability to define an O-Cloud and then support the registration of the O-Cloud via the IMS interface? 
    2. Would the SMO be able to deploy a packaged O-RAN using the K8s DMS profile? 
    3. If so then we can do the use cases (bolded) in slide 5, 6. The others would be incorporated once the SMO supports those features (e.g., inventory, O-Cloud retrieval)
  1. O-RAN NF
    1. Can we at least 1 O-RAN NF (say O-CU CP) and deploy that package via the SMO/NFO? (This would mean the package would have to be in the format the SMO could understand) 
    2. Can use O1 to change the configuration of an O-RAN NF (e.g., DU) – what, if anything, do we want to show regarding the O1 interface? Sagar said: DU we can configure via O1 and get the heartbeat. Can the SMO support this type of change?

...