...
- The list of repos that are to be included in Amber release under your project.
- For each repo, provide the following information:
- License Status:
- What license for each repo, Apache 2 or O-RAN?
- Whether the LICENSES.txt is included at the root of the repo and whether each code file has a license and copyright claim header?
- NOT including any contributing company proprietary information?
- Code status:
- Is the code available (code MUST be in by code freeze date of 11/04)?
- Is the code build-able?
- Is the building and artifact generation integrated with LF Jenkins? We can mark this item as "yes" if a particular repo implements a (a) verify, (b) merge and (c) daily release job. The group maintaining a repo needs to implement this.
- Documentation status:
- Following the documentation format, structure, and template provided by DOC project?
- Documentation buildable by the DOC project?
- Prepared a video demo for how to build and run your project.
...
(A) Project | (B) Repos | (C) License and Open Source Status | (D) Code and Building Status | (E) Documentation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(C.1) Apache2 or O-RAN | (C.2) Claims included? | (C.3) Proprietary info removed? | (D.1) Code available | (D.2) Buildable | (D.3) LF CI integrated | (E.1) Follow DOC | (E.2) DOC buildable | (E.3) Video demo | ||
| RICP | com/log | Apache2 | no, likely yes, but double-check packagecloud results are created | no | ||||||
| RICP | com/golog | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | com/pylog | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/a1 | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/appmgr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/dbaas | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/dbaas/hiredis-vip | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/e2 | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/e2mgr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/lib/rmr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/nodeb-rnib | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/rtmgr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/sdl | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/sdlgo | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/sdlpy | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/submgr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/utils | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/jaegeradapter | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/tracelibcpp | Apache2 | no, likely yes, but double-check packagecloud results are created | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/tracelibgo | Apache2 | no, likely yes, but double-check packagecloud results are created | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/vespamgr | Apache2 | yes | no | ||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/xapp-frame | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/asn1-documents | Creative Commons License, Attribution 4.0 Intl. | no, only documentation | no, not needed | yes | no | ||||
| RICP | ric-plt/streaming-protobufs | Creative Commons License, Attribution 4.0 Intl. | no, not needed. Definitions to be used by other repos | no, not needed | no | |||||
| RICP | ric-plt/resource-status-manager | Apache2 | no | |||||||
| RICP | ric-plt/ric-test | Apache2 | remains intentionally empty in Amber | no, not needed | no | |||||
| RICP | ric-plt/ric-dep | Apache2 | remains intentionally empty in Amber | no, not needed | no | |||||
| RICP | ric-plt/demo1 | Creative Commons License, Attribution 4.0 Intl. | not yet, but eventually within documentation timeline | not yet, but eventually within documentation timeline | no | |||||
...