Date

Attendees

Recording

The recording of the meeting is available here.

Discussions

John Keeney asked if smo/app is the folder that supports the packaging for SMO. Since apps refer to apps supported by Near RT-RIC and Non-RT RIC, he felt that the repo should be called smo/pkg or something like that.

Goals

  • Collect status of the individual projects

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minAgenda bashingAll
15 min Tacker project  Yuya Kuno

Yuya discussed the package format for the Tacker project. It has the requirement of having the following three items as the minimum in the package:

  • TOSCA.meta file at the root of the package
  • A VNFD.yaml file in the Definitions folder
  • An image file in Files/images

The current code in SMO repo supports reading of the TOSCA.meta file, but does not support the reading or extraction of the image beyond that. Explained that if Tacker project is expecting support, the project would have to bring that as contribution.

10 minTacker project committing guidelinesToshiaki Takahashi

Toshiaki Takahashi wanted to discuss committing guidelines for Tacker project to commit to smo/o2 repository. Please see his presentation in the Contributions section. A few of the questions have answers in the Developers Wiki page on Confluence. As far as the repo is concerned, it only needs the INFO.yaml file. Almost all other folders are optional. Some that are nice to have is a docs and a release folder.

Action items

  • Mahesh Jethanandanito request a new repo called smo/pkg and move the contents of smo/app into that repo.