Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents
maxLevel2

TOC Voting Members 

Company

NameAlternate

AT&T

Jack Murray Co-Chair

Lusheng Ji

China Mobile

Jinri Huang Co-Chair

Weichen Ni

Deutsche Telekom 

David Streibl

Ondřej Hudousek

NTT DOCOMO

Masafumi Masuda

Anil Umesh
OrangeWilliam DiegoVincent Danno

Verizon

Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya

Kristen Young

Nokia

Juha Oravainen

Thoralf Czichy

Radisys

Ganesh Shenbagaraman

Sachin Srivastava

Ericsson

John-Paul Lane


Available (10)Available (10)
Available (11)Available (11)
Available (12)Available (12)

*Quorum: 50% or more of total TOC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.


TOC Meeting Info

Technical Oversight Committee meetings are open to the public and held on Wednesdays at 8 AM Eastern Time USA.  World Time Zone Map

Zoom 2 Info:

  • Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS, or Android: https://zoom.us/j/6540568082
  • Or Telephone: Dial (for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location)
CityTimeZoom/Audio Bridge
UTC-timeWednesday 12:00

https://zoom.us/j/6540568082

New York (EDT / UTC-4)Wednesday 08:00+1 669 900 6833
+1 646 558 8656
855 880 1246 (Toll Free)
877 369 0926 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 654 056 8082
Paris (CEST / UTC+2)

Mar-11/Mar-18/Mar-25: Wednesday 13:00

Apr-1-2020 onwards: Wednesday 14:00

+33 7 5678 4048
+33 1 8288 0188
805 082 588 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 654 056 8082
Beijing (CST / UTC+8)Wednesday 20:00+86 10 87833177
+86 10 53876330
400 616 8835 (Toll Free)
400 669 9381 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID: 654 056 8082
Tokyo (JST / UTC+9) Wednesday 21:00+81 524 564 439
+81 3 4578 1488
0 800 100 5040 (Toll Free)
Meeting ID:
654 056 8082
Helsinki  (EEST / UTC+3)

Mar-11/Mar-18/Mar-25: Wednesday 14:00

Apr-1-2020 onwards: Wednesday 15:00

+358 341092129

Meeting ID: 654 056 8082



Anchor
todays agenda
todays agenda

2020 05

06

13

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu

  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair


    Lusheng Ji


    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair


    Weichen Ni


    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl


    Ondřej Hudousek


    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda


    Anil Umesh


    Orange

    William Diego


    Vincent Danno


    Verizon

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young


    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen


    Thoralf Czichy

    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman


    Sachin Srivastava

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane




    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

  4. Review of Today's Agenda

    1. Add O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW) May 31st Bronze delivery request to the top of the agenda because we ran out of time last week.
  5. Release Votes and Approval

  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)

    1. Virtual Exhibition.
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)

    ActionWilliam DIEGO update on the coordination with the O-RAN test group

  8. Actionuser-d3360  add the longer term test strategy to the agenda. 
  9. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)

    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling

      1. Project Bronze Release

    2. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee

    3. user-d3360  Integration and Test

      1. Gerrit review process improvement
      2. Integration and testing status report
    4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 

      1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)

      2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 

      3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 

      4. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 

      5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)

      6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)

        1. status update
      7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)

      8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)

      9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)

      10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)

      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)

  10. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 

    1. OAI purposed Meeting
    2. OSC Logo
  11. Planning for Next Meeting

  12. Any Other Business (AOB) 

  13. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)

Anchor
previous_meeting
previous_meeting

2020

04 29

Recording: 2020-04-29_toc.mp4

05 06

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen

Cefalu
  1. Cefalux`

  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji


    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair

    x

    Weichen Ni

    x

    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl

    x

    Ondřej Hudousek


    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

x


  1. Anil Umesh


    Orange

    William Diego

    x

    Vincent Danno


    Verizon

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young


    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen

    x

    Thoralf Czichy
x

  1. Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Sachin Srivastava

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane

    x



    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  2. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

Clarify comments about questions about 9.iii.a needed clarity so Farheen updated minutes.
    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for 
22
      1.  
      2. On motion made
by user-2057e
      1. by John-Paul Lane
      2. Seconded by 
weichen ni
      1. David Streibl
      2. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  1. Review of Today's Agenda

  • Release Votes and Approval

    1. Jack: we will need to vote on how to support the Viavi simulator as a part of our test environment.  At some point we will have to bring to vote a decision to request for funding to support a part of the bronze activity.  We are looking at it as a rental fee on the open source side.  People from Viavi are on the technical side. 
    2. If people are interested in this topic reach out to user-d3360 or user-59b16.  One of our challenges working in the RAN at some point we have to have devices and radios to simulator.  We have a small effort on simulating protocols but RAN simulator is more active.  The short term activity is how do we deal with this in Bronze without a full operating stack.  
    3. We need more paticipation in the test department.  There is a lot of activity going on there.
    4. ORAN Alliance and O-RAN SC are two different leadership. 
      1. Open source focus group in O-RAN Alliance.
      2. TOC is focus group in O-RAN SC.
      3. OSFG is asked to take a vote.  There are recommendations of the OSFG group in the O-RAN Alliance and there are votes for the TOC for the O-RAN SC.
      4. John-Paul Is there any information about the specification project?
        1. Jack: The O-RAN SC has a charter under the LF.  We follow LF guidelines.  O-RAN Alliance funds the LF for the O-RAN SC to operate under 2 licenses.
          1. Apache open source initiative.
          2. O-RAN Alliance license.  I am not a lawyer it is managed by the software alliance entity.  We use the Apache license, Documentation is slightly different.  The O-RAN license is managed by the O-RAN Alliance.  I do not call this an open source license.  In this forum I refer to it as a FRAND license.  We're an open source community we have the Apache license and the FRAND license from the O-RAN Alliance.  
          3. Jack: Look at the charter.  The charter for the OSC is an LLC founded in the USA under a series of LLC under the Linux Foundation.  We also have the O-CU and O-DU High.
          4. Jack: It is intended to mimic 3GPP and the O-RAN FRAND policy.  I am not a lawyer.
  • Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)

    1. Virtual Exhibition.
  • Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)

    1. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
    2. ActionWilliam DIEGO update on the coordination with the O-RAN test group
      1. William we are working with Viavi to establish a date.  Planning to integrate into the Cherry release timeline.
      2. Jack: I try to give people more time.  I encourage people to work ahead of the next release.  People should be thinking about participating the requirements for Cherry.  This way when we start talking full time about Cherry we are ready.
      3. We will need both long and short term 
    3. ActionWilliam DIEGO send John Murray the dates from the TIFG slide deck so he can add it to the Cherry Release timeline.
    4. Action / TOC Martin: We want to have data modeling on the wiki in a broader way.
      1. Martin will add a new page and link to the Program Developer Guide.
    5. ActionZhimin Yuan Sachin Srivastava come up with a timeline of your activities with user-d3360 because you are not going to make the timeline for the Bronze release.  Try to come up with a plan that will be able to be delivered in the Bronze Maint release for the FAPI and the O-DU Low and High.
      1. Zhimin: we did a lot of time on this.  
      2. Sachin: sharing slide deck.  Adding points.  We are discussing integrating plan.  We talk to Viavi about O-RU and O-CU.
        1. Trying to break into pieces.  Each piece has less dependecies.  We can do the P5 message integration using our own O-RU and O-CU stack.  But the dependency is properly installed and configured.  For O-DU high and O-DU low we got some agreement.
        2. Test Cases Profile For Example is very important for RAN Integration.  We need guidance of which section we should start.
        3. We have had discussions with Lusheng and Rittwik to move forward with the Cherry and Dawn release.  We have had a few gaps with O-DU High and O-DU Low.  We are targeting the P5 messages exchanged between High and Low.  We will be using the third dependency we will be using the L1 and L2 loss because there is no FAPI detector.  From a target perspective we will be targeting the P5 messages using the stub from O-CU.  Going forward we will need to define the use case call flows test plan where we can use O-RU and O-CU.
        4. Jack: Aknowledges and appreciates everyones effort.  Getting the P5 messages are a positive step forward.  P5 is something that will work in the Bronze release or the Cherry Release?
        5. Sachin:
          1. When we will hve the O-DU server to start testing.  I will need help with Lusheng.
          2. Configure the O-DU low and O-DU high. 
          3. Once we have agreement on these two points we will be able to provide a time estimate.  We will be using the Intel software in the lab to save time.
          4. Jack: We have had the Intel software reviewed by the O-RAN legal team.  You can use it.  It will be discussed at the TSC meeting and no one raises concerns we can move forward with using it.  Since it has passed legal review it should be OK.  We are setting up the lab with the servers.  I am making sure that the servers will be available.  I am in charge of that.  Delays are due to everyone working from home.
          5. Actionuser-d3360  add the longer term test strategy to the agenda.  Get it from Lusheng.
          6. Jack: The binary software should never be loaded into the LF repos.  It is built and deployed into the machines.  We have legal clearance to use it but I still have to get the TSC to approve.  We can start a second O-DU software to use a different approach.  Our goal is not to limit ourselves to one option. 
          7. Rittwik: Intel can only give permission by the end of May.  Does this mean we can start working in the lab and have phase 1 tested.
          8. Jack: We have been given legal clearance that we can use it.  As a risk item you can use it but it can't become a part of the official release policy.  
          9. Sachin: O-DU High we had a discussion.  It can be used to do the initial integration.  
          10. Lusheng: It can be a part of Bronze.  It can be integrated with the near Real Time RIC.
          11. Jack: How are we tracking the completeness in a release.  Are we planning to deliver 20% - 50%.  At some time we want to state that success when we do the interoperability testing.
    6. O-RAN Alliance Copyright update
      1. We are working the issue in detail.  Lawyers and board work approvals are ongoing.  It is a logistical issue.  There are no concerns about doing it but how to do it properly.  Part of the challenge is asking for approvals by paragraphs for specifications so we are trying to find out the implementation details.
  • Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)

    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling

      1. Project Bronze Release

      2. Does the time extension apply to all repos?
      3. No only the ones that request exentension.
      4. Lusheng: We have 4 tracks. for healthcheck we have to find out what can be delivered and what needs to be tested.  We need to have discussion with Martin, John, and Thoralf.
    2. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee

    3. user-d3360  Integration and Test

      1. Gerrit review process improvement
      2. Integration and testing status report
    4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 

      1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)

      2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 

      3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 

      4. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 

      5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)

      6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)

        1. Code is planned to be available on May 31.  Can we have O-DU Low for the Bronze release package?
        2. Jack: That puts us at the end of any cycle.  Can we work to put it into the Bronze maintenance release to give us enough time to test.
        3. Zhimin: The testing will be handled before May 31.  
        4. Jack: We will need to discuss further and we are near the end of the meeting.  We don't release code unless it has gone through the open source testing.  
        5. Action / Farheen Cefalu add this topic to the top of the agenda next week.
      7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)

      8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)

      9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)

      10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)

      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)

  • New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 

    1. OAI purposed Meeting
      1. Jack OSC wants a discussion with OSC.  
      2. OAI meeting is taking place?  
        1. Initial meeting between OSC and OAI TOC.  To see if they want to participate as an upstream project and a separate project.
        2. John-Paul: When will the invitation be sent?
        3. Action/ Jack: I will post that.  They have suggested some dates.
    2. OSC Logo
      1. Add O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW) May 31st Bronze delivery request to the top of the agenda because we ran out of time last week.
      2. Jack has copyright updates.  It should be a part of the agenda.  Action/ Farheen Cefalu add copyright updates to the agenda.
      3. Jack as we approach Cherry I would like to ask other team members to bring up changes to the agenda to improve the Cherry release.  I invite your ideas and recommendations of how we should adapt.  For others please work with the RSAC committee to start planning Cherry.  The more pre-work we can do it is better.  It is important that we as a team participate on the planning of Cherry.
    1. Release Votes and Approval

    2. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)

      1. Virtual Exhibition.
      2. Jinri - I was absent last week. 
        1. The virtual exhibition has been opened. ActionFarheen Cefalu add link to the website. 
        2. The demos once approved will be on the O-RAN website.  
        3. Jack it is not quite time yet to release information on our Bronze release.  Typically if we ask for companies to add statements it takes a little time.  We want to gather the statements in advance of the press release.  We should add this to the list.
      3. Nokia and AT&T will put something together for the plugfest.  During the plugfest which is 9-21-2020 we will put the RIC.
      4. Another idea we have to add here is the OSC logo.   What is a good logo that covers what we want to do.  If someone is interested in taking the lead.  We should add it under the marketing piece.  It is better to have a logo rather than text because other LF projects have logos.  Looking for TOC member who wants to take the lead on the logo.
    3. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)

      1. ActionWilliam Diego Maza update on the coordination with the O-RAN test group
        1. For the moment I just sent you the timeline for the ETE test focus group.  We need to update the Cherry release timeline.  I will continue to follow the test integration focus group.
      2. ActionLusheng Ji  add the longer term test strategy to the agenda. 
      3. ActionFarheen Cefalu add the update on the copyright issue for us.  This has been an ongoing decision for some time.
        1. Jack got confirmation from the legal team on item 1.  Each contributor retains the full copyrights...
        2. O-RAN does not technically doesn't have possession of the copyright material.  There is a gap in time.  See the item 2.
        3. Copyright
        4. The board has to grant permission to make the decisions.  The intent is broad to cover all the items that we have requested in the specifications.
        5. John-Paul: I interpret this to mean is OSC the A1 spec was worked on collaboratively we can go the executive committee to seek permission to use for specifications received by the Alliance.
          Jack: Once a spec is approved they will grant the use.  There is a little gap in once the o-ran alliance approves the spec.
        6. There is a third item that is being worked on for 3GPP.  I will invite someone to talk about that once it is ready to be shared.
    4. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)

      1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling

        1. Project Bronze Release

      2. Rittwik Jana Requirements Software Architecture Committee

        1. We started gathering the Cherry release items.  
        2. Rittwik: for O-DU to be functional we need to agree on a specific format or minimal viable configuration (bandwidth, numerology). Implementation depends on our consensus.  All upstream use cases will depend on that.  As a team we need to make progress.  If you infrastructure doesn't match the use case requirements.
        3. Zhimin - We want to know what are our priority contributions.
        4. Rittwik - In general how advanced does O-SC have to be?  We need advice from the TOC of what is the minimal viable feature set the O-DU supports.  OAI will also need this requirement also
        5. Ganesh - I believe we will benefit in another focused meeting. It can be feature rich that can be built out.  We need to have a roadmap done so we will see how it matures over the next three releases.  From Radisys we can support this approach.
        6. Jack - The minimal viable product set that we are coming up from an OSC standpoint is demonstrate the interfaces of O1, E1, E2 interfaces and show a minimally viable functional stack.  We need to define a scenario of three different radios that walk through a series of scenarios that run as a functioning stack.  How to install, operate, setup, tear down, hand off a session.  You need to demonstrate a working stack.  That is our first go.  Then you start working horizontally adding and improving functionality based on features and capabilities.  Without a stack in place with a very advanced CU or DU to talk to makes it a very fractured feature.  This is my thought process.  The integration test team has to demonstrate this minimal stack interfaces working together.
      3. Lusheng Ji  Integration and Test

        1. Gerrit review process improvement
          1. Two TOC meetings ago we continued the improving the test team process.  We recommend starting from Cherry we will putting out the messaging instead of enforcing during the gerrit review process.  The recommendation was let us first come up with Best Practices then review how it was executed and then enforce the gerrit workflow changes.  
            1. there is no self merging.  You have to get a +2 score from a reviewer who is not yourself.  The other is not allowing a huge single submission.
            2. Under Integration and Test Release Testing Plans we will have 3 use cases.  Healthcheck, O-DU Integration, and the Traffic Steering Use case.
            3. Team members review and make sure the flows are represented correctly Release Testing Plans
            4. Traffic Steering use case layer is planned to be delivered later this week.  I hope Matti's team can update the call flows so we can test.
            5. O-DU integration presented a deck two weeks ago. They will deliver in the Bronze point release.
            6. Jack: I look to the team to figure out a process to create a score card to track the progress of each process relative to the target requirements of each release.  That summary score card is what we will share with others.  No one will have a perfect score but we have to understand how each project will deliver.
        2. Integration and testing status report
      4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 

        1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)

        2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 

        3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 

        4. Yingying Wang O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 

        5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)

        6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)

          1. Bronze Release (Jun 2020) 
            1. Fronthaul interface in the source code format.
            2. Layer 1 in binary format.
            3. Testing structure for O-DU low internal testing.
            4. Jack will the O1 spec effect O-DU low or O-DU high?  How the O1 will handle the split?
            5. Zhimin No we are not discussing on O1. 
            6. Jack: Ganesh get to an agreement about the split.
            7. Ganesh: The O-DU plain once it is out it will have a consistent interface.  O-DU is one logical physical entity High and Low.
            8. Fapi Interface development slide 2. 
              1. We have fronthaul interface
              2. test mack stub will be stored in github repo.
              3. Inside is the O-DU low project with the FAPI translator.
            9. Jack Intel has submitted a license that the O-RAN legal team has accepted.  We are working toward tomorrow morning US Eastern time.  We have to get this on the TSC agenda.  We have to get the OSFG vote. The goal is to approve using the Intel binary as a test fixture in this structure.  O-RAN legal team has approved using it as a test fixture.  The software will not appear on the LF repo but be on demand on the test assembly.  We need to get approval from the OFSG members to vote and bring it to the TSC meeting.  Hopefully by tomorrow we will have approval.
            10. Zhimin: O-RAN Community B time line: Our target is May 31.  The code will be available in both the osc repo.  Can we be included in the Bronze release?
            11. Jack: That leaves no time for test.  We can make it available by the July time frame as a part of the Bronze maintenance release.  Generally we don't release code unless we can pass some of the tests and use cases.
            12. Zhimin: The binary license was agreed.  We are now focussed on the process.  We can start testing our software application in the lab.  If we can pull in one week?  Is that possible?
            13. Jack: Lusheng can testing be completed by the end of May?
            14. Lusheng: If everything works well and it's not too complicated.  Another gap we have the integration with O-DU High.  Ganesh? 
            15. Zhimin: For the Bronze release finished with O-DU High is not for Bronze but for Maintenance release.  Can O-DU Low be a part of the Bronze release?
            16. Lusheng: There is no integration test.  We call it unit test.  Jack I think Zhimin is asking for participation in normal release B and not as a part of the flow.  The flow will be delivered by the maintenance release.
            17. Jack the broader TOC needs to understand.  We don't have to make a final decision this week.  Let's take it up next week at the TOC level to see if we are OK with including O-DU Low as a part of the Bronze release with only unit testing.  Let us take a vote on it next week on how we want to proceed.  Is it a part of maintenance or Bronze.  
        7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)

        8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)

        9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)

        10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)

        11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)

    5. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 

      1. OAI purposed Meeting
      2. OSC Logo
    6. Planning for Next Meeting

      1. Next Tuesday there is an OAI meeting.  If you wish to participate please join the zoom meeting for next Tuesday.  We will hear from the OAI group of what they are thinking about activities, coordination, and interest.  
    Planning for Next Meeting
    1. Any Other Business (AOB) 

    2. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)