You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

2020 04 29

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu

  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji


    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair


    Weichen Ni

    x

    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl

    x

    Ondřej Hudousek


    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

    x

    Anil Umesh


    Orange

    William Diego

    x

    Vincent Danno


    Verizon

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young


    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen


    Thoralf Czichyx

    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Sachin Srivastava

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane

    x



    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for  
      2. On motion made by Jinri Huang
      3. Seconded by John-Paul Lane
      4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
    2. Clarify comments about questions about 9.3. not certain about item a.
  4. Review of Today's Agenda

  5. Release Votes and Approval

  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)

    1. Virtual Exhibition.
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)

    1. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
    2. Action/ William DIEGO update on the coordination with the O-RAN test group
    3. ActionWilliam DIEGO send John Murray the dates from the TIFG slide deck so he can add it to the Cherry Release timeline.
    4. Action / TOC Martin: We want to have data modeling on the wiki in a broader way.
    5. ActionZhimin Yuan Sachin Srivastava come up with a timeline of your activities with user-d3360 because you are not going to make the timeline for the Bronze release.  Try to come up with a plan that will be able to be delivered in the Bronze Maint release for the FAPI and the O-DU Low and High.
    6. O-RAN Copyright update
  8. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)

    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling

      1. Project Bronze Release

    2. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee

    3. user-d3360  Integration and Test

      1. Gerrit review process improvement
      2. Integration and testing status report
    4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 

      1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)

      2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 

      3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 

      4. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 

      5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)

      6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)

        1. status update
      7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)

      8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)

      9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)

      10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)

      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)

  9. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 

    1. OAI purposed Meeting
    2. OSC Logo
  10. Planning for Next Meeting

  11. Any Other Business (AOB) 

  12. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)

2020 04 22

Recording: 2020-04-22_toc_audio_only.m4a

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu

  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji


    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair

    x

    Weichen Ni


    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl


    Ondřej Hudousek


    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

    x

    Anil Umesh


    Orange

    William Diego


    Vincent Danno


    Verizon

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young


    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen

    x



    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Sachin Srivastava

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane

    x



    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for  
      2. On motion made by user-2057e
      3. Seconded by weichen ni
      4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  4. Review of Today's Agenda

    1. Rittwik requesting time extension for RIC App and E2 SIM enhancements.  This will be covered during Rittwik's status.
    2. Jack: O-AI offered to discuss align or collaborate.
    3. Lusheng: Added two items under integration and test section.
    4. John Keeney: Wants to ask a question about Licensing
  5. Release Votes and Approval

    1. Vote Release Name for D release is Dawn.

  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)

    1. ONES = LF Networking Conference tentatively August/ September (Los Angeles).  Open Networking & Edge Summit Event

    2. Virtual exhibition meeting will be open soon.  Jinri will be meeting with O-RAN Alliance.
    3. Last week people discussed the virtual meeting for June to replace the face to face due to COVID-19.
      1. the virtual meeting will be a little different.
      2. Action/ Jinri Huang  work with Farheen to mark this as an open item.
    4. Jack: There is one marketing item.  Most other open source projects have a logo.  In the early days we talked about creating a logo for O-RAN SC.  It got pushed to the background.  The LF will help with registering a logo.  If a TOC member is interested in taking it on let the TOC know.  It's nice to have and takes time to work through different peoples ideas.  
    5. Jack: I will be replacing the LF Edgeboard AT&T employee.  I will keeping these activities separate.  I wanted to let this team know.
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)

    1. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
    2. ActionFarheen Cefalu work with Tracy Van Brakle to update the events page with plugfests. 

    3. Action/ William DIEGO update on coordination with the O-RAN test group

      1. William presenting slides.
      2. Idea is to have different ETE test spec coordination between O-RAN (Test Integration Focus Group) and OSC.
      3. Jack suggested to add use cases and tools.  We want to make sure we are aligning on the ETE use cases.  The use cases will drive software and drive it back to the TIFG.
      4. Is OSS Open Source Software? 
      5. Yes, up to now we are integrating different software 
      6. William: This scheme tries to illustrate the test and integration framework.
      7. John: Do you mean no Real time RIC?
      8. William: In this first version we will not integrate the RIC.
      9. John: Proprietary OAM interfaces there's no real time RIC there's no A1.
      10. Eng Wei the ETE framework includes all the O-RAN Alliance specifications and all the requirements.  We will be mapping from a subsystem perspective.  Allow blueprint deployment.  What to do via subsystem level.  all the specs will be in place day 1.  Telecom Italia wants to validate the RIC using use cases. Dynamic traffic steering is something they need to use as well.
      11. Jack: I agree with everyone here.  This baseline scenario does not leverage what we have today.
      12. Rittwik: Yes, because ORU is being tested in Bronze.
      13. Jack: But we don't have O-RU?
      14. Yes,
      15. Jack: The way this picture is described is legacy.  As part of the plan for Cherry we have to start understanding how we are going to play into these.  I like your picture on timeline.  We should fold these key dates into our timeline on our release management.
      16. ActionWilliam DIEGO send John Murray the dates from the TIFG slide deck.
    4. ActionWilliam DIEGO provide more details of how the use cases and Jira items reflect the activities.  simple flow diagram of our activities and their activities and how they are going to work together.
    5. Action/ PTLs provide user-d3360  with your sprint 3 demo dates.
    6. ActionMartin Skorupski add the link for the yang model to the wiki. https://forge.etsi.org/rep/3GPP/SA5/data-models/tree/master/yang-models
      1. Martin: We want to have data modeling on the wiki in a broader way.
  8. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)

    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling

      1. Project Bronze Release

      2. Rittwik: Asking for two weeks to add on to the end of the timeline.
    2. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee

      1. Rittwik requesting time extension for RIC App and E2 SIM enhancements.  This will be covered during Rittwik's status.
      2. There are 3 key pieces
        1. Viavi sim files need to come thru.  
        2. Once those files are produced the E2 sim is getting enhanced.  Alex will run with it.
        3. Once E2 format is formed the xApps can start consuming.
      3. We want to make some progress to help gear what we want to do in the next release.  A lot of parties have to get together.  It is better to get this done now.
      4. Alex: What Rittwik said is what I am aware of.  I am talking to Ron and things are going well.
      5. Jack: The code we're talking about is primarily in the simulator project.
      6. Matti: KPI, Traffic steering xApps and ML.  Ron's time is being split between sim and xapp and we lost a developer.  All the interfaces are nailed down so the development can occur in parallel.
      7. Jack: If we stay on the current schedule what kind of functionality will be available.  We have two options we can slide the test date out or stay on schedule and bring some functionality to the maintenance release.
      8. Matti: If you scroll up to the previous screen.  Right now we are at the end of dev sprint 4.  The good thing is the changes between simulator, xapps, and platform will be simpler because we don't need to integrate O-CU, O-DU. 
      9. Rittwik: it's OK to demonstrate in parts.  It's important and will resonate.
      10. Jack: We do ETE sprint testing and then another two weeks of ETE testing.
      11. Lusheng: We are OK.  We will have three separate tracks.  Since this extension impacts Traffic Steering use case.  It is fine to schedule the testing for this track a little later.  We can take a phased approach.  Finish testing of phase one.  We can complete within the release schedule.
      12. Zhimin: O-DU low and O-DU high need an extension to finish development to May 17.  We are following the Intel process.  I need two weeks more.
      13. Jack: It looks like 3 weeks more.
      14. Zhimin: Yes, May 17.  After Intel process we are looking at May 31.  Code freeze is May 17.  
      15. Jack: That's three weeks behind the deadline.  This has to do with developing inside Intel and then dumping them out.  It is best practice to contribute code as you develop for collaboration in open source.
      16. Lusheng: It' not like other components like docker containers.  This is tigher integration.  
      17. Action/ Zhimin Yuan provide a time of when you will be able to deliver?
      18. Sachin: From O-DU High we are going to have the code ready but the integration will take four to five weeks.
      19. ActionZhimin Yuan Sachin Srivastava come up with a timeline of your activities with user-d3360 because you are not going to make the timeline for the Bronze release.  Try to come up with a plan that will be able to be delivered in the Bronze Maint release for the FAPI and the O-DU Low and High.  Please try to get it in the B release window.  It's important to have in the Bronze release.  We need to stick with the timeline and deliver the functionality and work into the open source repos and pay attention to the timelines.
    3. user-d3360  Integration and Test

      1. Gerrit review process improvement 
        1. Lusheng: presenting a deck.  During the release I took at the current practice and making some suggestions. gerret requires +2 reviews after jenkins job has passed.  Then the submission becomes mergable.  The problem is if the submitter is a committer as well he can submit the code and give a +2 and merge the code.  We are losing the advantage of using gerret.  There is an improved merging policy call NACR Non-authore code review. 
        2. Ask TOC to move forward with the +2 requirement.  
        3. Jack: Are you asking to use it Bronze or Cherry?
        4. Lusheng: Either way I recommend we start on Cherry due to time delays.
        5. Jack Let's talk about it more next week.  We are not going to change it.
        6. Lusheng: Another practice is to limiting the submission size.  Gerret will block submissions exceeding certain size limits.  Something for us to consider what we want to adopt.  We want to do all the code changes in gerret open source because there is a 5000 lines of code limit. 
      2. Branching and testing strategy
        1. Once testing starts do not adding code to the master branch.  By code freeze we are expecting bug fixes and documentation fixes to the master branch.
        2. For all the repos the code freeze date is this weekend.  Repos involved are the traffic steering use case and the O-DU low and O-DU high.  Branching strategy diagram it is starting the code freeze time and some members of the team create a development branch and put your development code on the development branches.  Once completed make a branch for Bronze.  This time we are going to use all lower case "b". 
        3. After you branch the master branch is open for development again.  If new bugs are being discovered then fix and cherry pick for the head.  It should be the best for the B release.
        4. For healthcheck here are the projects involved from RSAC implementation.
        5. Track 1: We'll finish the RSAC flows.  Track: 2 Approach is the same for call flows. Track 3 O-DU Integration.
        6. Testing Plan 
        7. Testing Set Up we will be using the open public AT&T T-Lab.  For track 2 and 2 we are going to use 2 VMs.  One will run near realtime RIC and the other will run SMO, O-RAN Lite
    4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 

      1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)

      2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 

      3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 

      4. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 

      5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)

      6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)

      7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)

      8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)

      9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)

      10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)

      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)

  9. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 

    1. OAI purposed Meeting
    2. Licensing: John O-RAN Alliance specs.  What is the relationship with O-SC and O-RAN Alliance regarding licensing.
      1. Jinri: Stefan prepared documentation.  EC discussed this and propose it hopes that the board can give the authority to approve a similar request in the future to save time.  
      2. Regarding re-using of the spec there is not specific request for this.
      3. ActionJohn Keeney send John Murray your question regarding your licensing question.
        1. O-RAN Alliance can not grant copyright until specification has been approved.
          1. If a company has copyright priv. it can retain that copyright priv and get clarification from the legal team.
          2. Because that company still has copyright priv. it can contribute 
          3. Content in messages requires a separate copyrite.  They don't want us to release the whole specifications in open source.  It's the content of those messages needs to be copyrights on.
          4. John: it's for the schema definition.
          5. Jack: Send me a note and I want to put it on the list.
  10. Planning for Next Meeting

  11. Any Other Business (AOB) 

  12. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)

2020 04 15

Recording: 2020-04-15_TOC.mp4

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu
  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji

    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair

    xWeichen Ni

    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl

    xOndřej Hudousek

    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

    xAnil Umesh
    Orange

    William Diego

    xVincent Danno

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young

    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen

    x

    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane

    x

    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

  4. Review of Today's Agenda
    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for  
      2. On motion made by user-2057e
      3. Seconded by Juha Oravainen
      4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  5. Release Votes and Approval
    1. Vote Release Name: Vote is active to choose name of "D" release.
      1. Running the vote until Saturday.  It looks like Dawn will be the color.
    2. OCU new repo 5G
      1. Jack: As we talked about the last two meetings.  We had some issues with the O-CU project.  Ran into problem where contributors brought in code that they were not allowed to bring to the project.  Since we have cleaned up.  LF decided to drop all code in the O-CU project and focus more on Best Practices and other activities.  It aligns with what's been changed in the O-CU project.  Some new contributors are coming in and we're moving on to the 5G code.
      2. Yingying: For O-CU I have a new repo request 5GNR.
      3. Jinri: Several weeks ago we mobilized a few more contributors on this project.  We will submit a request for a new repo.  We developed a timeline for contributing O-CU code for 5G.  The first patch of code will be uploaded by early next month or the earliest at the end of this month.
      4. Lusheng: The previous code from the Amber release has been purged from the repo.  March 17 there was a new repo request.  Do you want to withdraw the previous request? 
        1. Jinri: The request was raised in March is a part of the restart process.  Thank you for this reminder.
        2. Lusheng: This request is still outstanding.  We will send this out to the main mailing list.  
        3. Jinri: I approved two.
        4. Jack: I want to review for this approval.  Some of the TOC were not included.  This is trying to restart the process with new code and contributors.  We will restart the process focused on 5G.  This code was not in the previous contributions.  We are working closely with contributors to tighten up the best practices and process.  We need to create a repo to restart this process.  Are there any questions?
          1. Ganesh: We are re-writing all the code?
          2. Jack: The code will be 5G O-CU.  Yingying is still the PTL but we are working with a new team of contributors and new code.
          3. Jack: Request a vote to approve a new O-CU 5G repo 
            1.  Vote to approve a new O-CU 5G repo 
            2. On motion made by Jinri Huang
            3. Seconded by user-2057e
            4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)
    1. ONES = LF Networking Conference tentatively August/ September (Los Angeles).  Open Networking & Edge Summit Event
 
      1. Action/ Jinri Huang communicate the online events on the wiki.
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)
    1. Action/ update on O-CU plans
      1. It is important to have the team do contributions to draw more people to participate in your project.
    2. Action/ update on Intel license agreement on binary usage 
      1. Jack: People may remember as part of O-DU in Bronze doesn't have layer 1 open source contributed at this time.  Intel has offered a binary image of their flex ran software to be used for the O-DU low.  We have been tied to that binary license for testing O-RAN purposes.  We have been trying to have a review with the Intel.  We are hoping for Bronze release to have a test instance of O-DU with Intel binary as a part of that.  There is still progress.  We are looking for contributions and activities for feedback and guidance.  It still has to go for the O-RAN legal team review.  Remember that's not Open Source Code.  The O-DU project is organizing that.
        1. Zhimin (Intel): we will provide a doc file in the O-SC community. 
    3. Action/ new TOC members provide an alternate contact for TOC calls when they are unable to attend. 
      1. Send Jack your 
    4. Action ENGWEI KOO  - will add a deck to RSAC wiki.
      1. Engwei and Rittwik added the deck to the RSAC wiki.
    5. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
      1. O-RAN Alliance created a demo space.  Action/ Jinri Huang work with Farheen to put the virtual demos on our wiki.
    6. ActionFarheen Cefalu work with Tracy Van Brakle to update the events page with plugfests. 
      1. The days have been finalized.  It will be the last week of Sept first week of October activities in all three zones.  It will be joint this time it will be joined with Integration and test team in Europe.  A series of events in Asia, Europe, North America.  Not duplicative but complimentary.
      2. Jack: Thank you Tracy.   It is important to learn from our activities.
    7. Actionuser-2057e update Vote Release Name page with the D release name option
      1. you can now vote on name for release D here: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/REL/Vote+Release+Name
    8. ActionJinri Huang provide the TOC with the new O-RAN Alliance timeline.
      1. This was done when we discussed the Cherry release.
    9. ActionTrishan de Lanerolle let us know the outcome of the ticket that John Keeney  opened regarding the Calendar synchronization.
      1. Trishan: Yes, we came back with the recommendation to use the Confluence calendar with the UTC time.
      2. John: It will require people who have Confluence calendars to move over to the groups.io calendar and to change the calendars to UTC.  For a couple weeks the organizers around the world will have to decide what to do for the 
      3. Matin: Is it possible to remove the calendars?
      4. Trishan: We will work on doing that.
      5. ActionFarheen Cefalu update the Calendar Best Practices.  Remind Jack.
    10. Action/ PTLs update your project summaries with your sprint 2 status updates.  Be prepared to review your sprint 2 deliverables with the TOC.
      1. We are in sprint 3.  It is best to incrementally update each projects progress as we move forward.
    11. Action/ Jack will review Thoralf's How to request committer changes
    12. Actionuser-d3360 add the wiki link for SONAR to the Integration and Test wiki where people can easily find.
      1. Lusheng: We will make it easier to find the information for SONAR on the Project Developer Wiki.
      2. Jack: Use the project developer wiki for Best Practices.
    13. Action/ William DIEGO update on coordination with the O-RAN test group
      1. William: We have contributions from CMCC AT&T, Orange.  Blueprints will be updated.  Work is ongoing.
      2. Jack: If there is a need to have a meeting let us know.
      3. Rittwik: We need to understand the specifications or testing activities.  We are contributing but I don't see a plan of how TIST and ORAN-Alliance will be coordinate.
      4. Jack: We need a simple flow diagram of our activities and their activities and how they are going to work together.
      5. ActionWilliam DIEGO provide more details of how the use cases and Jira items reflect the activities.  simple flow diagram of our activities and their activities and how they are going to work together.
    14. Action/ PTLs provide user-d3360  with your sprint 3 demos. 
      1. O-DU HIGH next Wednesday.
  8. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)
    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling
      1. Project Bronze Release
      2. Jack: Looking at our release plan.  Today is the 4-15.  That is dev 4 sprint ist sprint 3.  We are well into the development cycle process.  We have a week and a half to move into ETE testing and interoperability.  Looking at Jira items.  People testing software it is important to work issues between O-CU high and O-CU low.  All the modules need to work with the self test for the capability of the ETE use cases and the progress on the use cases.  Important to have documentation.  Looking at C release with Cherry I have restructured the table to reflect the Maintenance release to give folks a chance to get their backlogs items completed.  This is in Cherry even though it's Bronze release.
    2. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee
      1. We are tracking the Traffic Steering use case closely.  Working with Viavi for metrics.  Ron is enhancing the E2 simulator.  That will get worked into this last sprint.  Matti has the TSxApp to make progress. Regards to healthcheck Martin and John.  Speaking to Eliza the healthcheck is getting more ellaborate if youre making changes check back with John Ng and David Kinsey.  If you're making large changes.
      2. John: John Ng is aware and is happy.
      3. Eliza: John will finalize the documentation, right?
      4. John: Yes, OTF documentation is coming together nicely.
      5. Eliza: We worked with Martin for healthcheck2.  Once we have the interface spec for healthcheck 3.  In the mean time the team was working with other information.
      6. John: Let us work together.
      7. Matti: Please keep me in the loop for the A1 healthcheck.  I need to know.
      8. Jack: The question is with all of that work is it staying aligned with the specs coming out of the O-RAN working groups?
      9. Rittwik: Not sure.
      10. Jack: I am making sure we are staying aligned.
      11. Martin: Yes, we try to keep aligned problem WG is 3GPP.  It looks similar but it's not with 3GPP.  I am directly in contact with 3GPP modeler.  There is good progress on the yang model.  This is a major step.
      12. Jack: Did you add that link?
      13. ActionMartin Skorupski add the link for the yang model to the wiki.
      14. Martin: I wrote a script that will pull the yum models.
      15. Eliza: We need to document what we are doing.  We want to do it incrementally so we are in synch.  Also operators and vendors are supposed to create the tests.  It is important to provide the test team with instructions.
      16. Jack: it is important to carry evolution forward incrementally.
      17. Tracy: We are within working group 1 in the O-RAN Alliance.  We are forming a formal pathway to get the data models from O-RAN to 3GPP so there is version control easy to download data models.  That will be worked out in WG1 and properly documented.
      18. Jack: Do you see there will be yang models beyond 3G-PP.  
      19. Martin: We already have them.  Fronthaul Yang files are in gerrit for modeling.  Also from IXRAN to O-RAN.  They are available for the software community.
      20. Jack: is there an easier way to organize.
      21. Tracy: A reason for O-RAN Alliance we brought in the 5G baseline model from 3GPP and in parallel numerous 3GPP Yang models in need of repair.  They are upstream 3gPP and augmenting 3GPP.  I think we're going to have the repo reside where it is right now and allow access to the O-RAN software community.  We don't want to proliferate.
      22. Lusheng: What license are these under?
      23. Tracy: We are working one on one with the operator liason with 3GPP.
      24. Lusheng: Whether oran alliance 3gpp the question is are we hosting those models?
      25. Tracy: We won't host it on O-SC.
      26. Lusheng: Yes, we don't have to host it if it is in github.  We can just pull github.
      27. Martin: They don't have a license statement on github so we asked them to add their licenses for the yang models.
      28. Jack: the new ones that are generated in O-RAN where are they going?
      29. Martin: It's the decision of O-RAN Alliance.
    3. user-d3360  Integration and Test
    4. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 
      1. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)
      2. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 
      3. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 
      4. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 
      5. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)
      6. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)
      7. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)
      8. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)
      9. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)
      10. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)
      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)
  9. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 
  10. Planning for Next Meeting
  11. Any Other Business (AOB) 
  12. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)

2020 04 08

Recording: 2020-04-08_toc.mp4

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu
  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji

    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair

    xWeichen Ni

    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl

    xOndřej Hudousek

    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

    xAnil Umesh
    Orange

    William Diego

    xVincent Danno

    Viswa Kumar


    Kristen Young

    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen

    x

    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane




    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TSC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for  
      2. On motion made by user-2057e
      3. Seconded by Juha Oravainen
      4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  4. Review of Today's Agenda
    1. Issue of licensing and code contributions in O-CU gerrit repos
      LF investigated also
      taking an unusual activity for our community, code needs to be removed
      will restart the O-CU project with new, empty repos
      rebuilding is the easiest way to clean up and address all concerns
      re-examining some best practices
      concerns?

    2. Rittwik asked, integrated eNodeB OCU or distributed eNodeB OCU?

      Jack answered, Affects all OCU repos.
      Jack asked, how much OCU is used in this release?
      Rittwik answered, not very much.
      William asked, new contributors in OCU?
      Jack answered, contributors to area of concern have changed; 4G area
      has been reexamined; 5G area has different contributors; focusing on
      5G portion which didn't have code/licensing issues
      William asked, only 4G code is impacted? 5G also?
      Jack answered, going thru process for both as everything is
      re-submitted, adhering to guidelines; LF giving guidance how best to
      proceed.
      John Paul asked, how to capture lessons learned from OCU project,
      publicize to other projects?
      Jack answered, this gives us an opportunity to review best practices
      and make sure people are aware & complying, following well-established
      open source guidelines for all projects, so other projects can avoid
      complications. Rely on contributors to follow guidelines, sometimes
      have to clean things up, taking a strong step to address the
      concerns.
      John Paul asked, these principles and guidelines, where are they
      published?
      Jack answered, the O-RAN-SC wiki has the page, not easy to find,
      https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/ORAN/Best+Practices

  5. Release Votes and Approval
    1. Vote is active to choose name of "D" release.
      Leading candidate today is "Dawn"
      What color is Dawn? Nobody was quite certain.
  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)
    1. ONES = LF Networking Conference tentatively August/ September (Los Angeles).  Open Networking & Edge Summit Event
 
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)
    1. Action/ new TOC members provide an alternate contact for TOC calls when they are unable to attend. 
    2. Action ENGWEI KOO  - will add a deck to RSAC wiki.
    3. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
    4. Action / Tracy Van Brakle clarify Open Testing and Integration (OTIC) North America 
    5. ActionFarheen Cefalu work with Tracy Van Brakle to update the events page with plugfests. 
    6. Actionuser-59b16 upload the UE emulator short/long term slide deck to the RSAC page.
    7. Action/ TOC provide feedback to Jack regarding the Cherry and D Release calendars on the Releases page
    8. Action/ Jinri Huang will point Thoralf Czichy to the appropriate WG specification times.  There are 3 trains for the specifications.  
    9. Actionuser-2057e update Vote Release Name page with the D release name options.
      1. you can now vote on name for release D here: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/REL/Vote+Release+Name

    10. ActionJinri Huang provide the TOC with the new O-RAN Alliance timeline.
    11. ActionTrishan de Lanerolle let us know the outcome of the ticket that John Keeney  opened regarding the Calendar synchronization.
    12. Action/ PTLs update your project summaries with your sprint 2 status updates.  Be prepared to review your sprint 2 deliverables with the TOC.
    13. Action/ Jack will review Thoralf's How to request committer changes
    14. Actionuser-d3360 add the wiki link for SONAR to the Integration and Test wiki where people can easily find.
    15. Action/ user-59b16 set up a meeting with Viavi, O-RAN Alliance test committee (whoever is leading the test committee (David Orloff)), and the TOC.  
    16. Action/ William DIEGO  we need a test coordinator with the O-RAN test group so we can come up with a common plan between the test groups 
    17. Actionuser-d3360 add the link in the Integration and Test wiki to the SONAR instructions that you discussed on  TOC meeting.
    18. Action/ PTLs provide user-d3360  with your sprint 2 demos. 
  8. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)
    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling
      1. Project Bronze Release
    2. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 
      1. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP) 
        1. Ongoing activity RIC applications -
          Matti H. gave update that a person is assigned for simulator

      2. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 
        1. note I updated the committer change process as per discussion last week: How to request committer changes.
        2. Thoralf C. gave update
          . many epics in Bronze release
          . 8 done, 6 in progress, 38 not started
          . 2 new epics related to ASN.1 problem

          Thoralf C. asked, is there progress on ASN.1 legal issues with 3GPP and
          ORAN Alliance?
          Jack M. answered, writeup is being reviewed, process is onerous, have to
          go to board for permission
          Jinri H. answered, EC has reviewed, (?) has approved, then will forward
          request to board
          Jack M. answered, once approved it can be used by all ORAN projects, not
          just one
          Jinri H. clarified, this is for ASN.1; Hank wants to broaden request.
          Current request is from Thoralf targeting specific ASN.1 content in
          one ORAN specification. Want to broaden this to apply to all the
          ASN.1 content from ORAN alliance. Hank wants to improve/refine the
          proposal so it's a bit on hold. Expect to hear tomorrow. Once the
          specific request is approved, it will apply to all projects.

          Held demo of development sprint 3, recording is available for people to
          view

      3. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 
        1. Ongoing activity - OCU
          skipped, have discussed the exception being handled there
      4. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)
        1. Ongoing activity - ODUHIGH
          Sachin of Radisys gave update
          Demonstrated F1-U and F1-C
          working on traffic steering implementation, that will be in next
          demonstration, with limitations based on specification
          working with Intel team on IPC mechanisms and L1
          might have to push some content to Cherry release due to recent late
          changes
          expect to be formally available in ORAN wiki
          Jack asked, please update wiki page to capture progress
          Sachin added, seeing lots of effort required here
          Jack asked, are working group specifications coming out, how is the
          interface to the WGs functioning?
          Sachin answered, they are aligning to specifications; also dependent on
          E2 SM specifications, may have to adapt
      5. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)
        1. Ongoing activity - ODULOW
          Zhimin Yuan of Intel gave update
          working on shared memory feature between ODULOW and ODUHIGH
          Jack asked, have you updated wiki pages with status?
          Zhimin answered, have updated for front haul library; other pieces in
          development
          Rittwik asked, for the WLS binary files, this is not exactly open
          source, cannot see the IPC mechanisms used, is this done or in
          progress?
          Zhimin answered, in progress, shared with Radisys
          Rittwik asked, how will it work eventually?
          Zhimin answered, get approval from Intel, pass legal check
          Rittwik asked, will be approved for Bronze release?
          Zhimin answered, it is possible but not definite
          Rittwik noted, this is a bilateral arrangement today; unclear how it
          will work in the future
          Zhimin answered, working for approval by end of May
      6. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)
        1. Ongoing activity - OAM
          Martin S. of Highstreet gave update
          Working to finalize the deployment
          Contribution depends on YANG models
          Got in contact with 3GPP YANG developers directly for assistance
          Hoping to use YANG models as basis in Cherry release
          Identified use case to be proposed for Cherry, a software update from
          XRAN device, becomes ORAN front-haul device, maybe O1 device
          Jack suggested, get this in early to requirements group
          Martin noted, Jira pages are very slow to load
          Jack asked, how are demonstrations of health check going?
          Martin answered, demonstration tomorrow of using a health check, but
          not sure if it can be recorded; demo can be repeated anytime
      7. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)
        1. Ongoing activity - simulators
          Alex S. of Highstreet gave update
          finally have a resource to work on simulator
          hope to finish what they need for traffic steering use case
          working on build job for Jenkins at LF
          health check use case is implemented in the project
          John is working on moving A1 stub simulator into repos
          Jack asked, stub simulator in this release?
          Alex answered, yes only have to move Jenkins jobs
      8. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)
        1. Ongoing activity - infrastructure
          Xiaohua Z. of Wind River gave update
          By end of March had ARM-based K8S cluster available
          Want to use third-party layer1/layer2 to demonstrate
          Invites people to look at code in integration repo
          working with ODULOW project so their deliverable meets requirements
          hope to finish this week, plan to work with integration team in
          integration lab
          rest of Jira is related to platform services enabling, ongoing
          schedule is challenging, have good chance to finish in Bronze
          holding biweekly meetings, minutes are in the wiki
          Jack asked, will ARM-based system be available to wider community, to
          see the demo?
          Xiaohua answered, code has been upstreamed into repo, instructions are
          uploaded how to build and run demo, but Layer 1/layer 2 applications
          are from third-party company, only agreed to use as demo not open
          source, shows capability of ARM-based platform
          Jack noted, important to have diversity in the project; please follow
          best practices around open-source contributions vs test fixtures, make
          clear what's open source and what is only a demo test fixture
      9. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)
        1. Ongoing activity - documentation
          Weichen N. of China Mobile gave update
          not many new features
          created a label on documentation page to switch between branches
          already have amber from last year
          when we release bronze release, can have selection button for bronze
          next is API documentation
          if any project is willing to add API doc, please let Weichen know and
          he will collect the doc from different projects to form OSC API
          document
          Jack asked, need to pull together doc on end-to-end use cases part of
          Bronze release; work with RSAC committee to understand where will we
          send someone as part of Bronze release to see use cases, also a
          description of how to recreate/download/build use cases as end user;
          people need to learn from use cases, as projects deliver their pieces
          and users come in to see what we have done
      10. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)
        1. Reached 9am, unable to hear John's update on NON realtime RIC,
          John will go first at next meeting
      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)
    3. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee
    4. user-d3360  Integration and Test
  9. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 
    1. New item: OAI John Murray
  10. Planning for Next Meeting
  11. Any Other Business (AOB) 
    1. No other new business.
  12. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)

2020 04 01

Recording2020-04-01_toc.mp4

Agenda

  1. Call for Scribe (minutes owner) Farheen Cefalu
  2. Roll Call & Quorum Check 

    Company

    Contact Name

    Attendance

    Alternate Contact

    Attendance

    AT&T

    Jack Murray Co-Chair

    x

    Lusheng Ji

    China Mobile

    Jinri Huang Co-Chair

    xWeichen Ni

    Deutsche Telekom 

    David Streibl


    Ondřej Hudousek

    NTT DOCOMO

    Masafumi Masuda

    xAnil Umesh
    Orange

    William Diego

    xVincent Danno

    Viswa Kumar


    Skand Priya

    Nokia

    Juha Oravainen

    x

    Radisys

    Ganesh Shenbagaraman

    x

    Ericsson

    John-Paul Lane

    x

    *Quorum: 50% or more of total TOC voting members unless excluded due to attendance.  We have a quorum and can vote on activities.

    1. TOC Membership has increased.  It has been one year of the O-RAN-SC.  
    2. Action/ new TOC members provide an alternate contact for TOC calls when they are unable to attend.
  3. Review and Agree to Minutes of Previous Meeting 

    1. The minutes of the prior meetings were reviewed, and there were no comments, questions or corrections.
      1. Vote to approve minutes for  
      2. On motion made by Jinri Huang
      3. Seconded by William DIEGO
      4. VOTE: Vote taken, item passed
  4. Review of Today's Agenda
    1. Email from OAI
      1. Jack needs to share that Jinri and Jack received an email from Open Air Interface with concerns with this project.  Jack forwarded the email to the legal team to review.  Jack will be able to address when he has clarification from legal.
    2. Lusheng: I would like to request a time slot during the 04/01 ToC weekly meeting to present the current plan for integration and testing Bronze release.
      It will take about 5 minutes.
  5. Release Votes and Approval
  6. Marketing of the current release (WG, LF, PR)
    1. ONES = LF Networking Conference tentatively August/ September (Los Angeles).  Open Networking & Edge Summit Event
 
    2. Virtual O-RAN demo was about to be activated.  The site has been constructed and is being reviewed by EC.  Will notify Farheen when the site is public.  There are around 20 demos.
  7. Status of Open Action Items (Old Business)Jack - How does the OSC evolve from where we're at.  Every piece is under construction.  O-DU Emulation will help with that.
    1. Action ENGWEI KOO  - will add a deck to RSAC wiki.
    2. Action / Jinri Huang work with Farheen to add the MWC demos and presentations to the O-RAN SC wiki once posted to the O-RAN Alliance.
    3. Action / Tracy Van Brakle clarify Open Testing and Integration (OTIC) North America 
    4. ActionFarheen Cefalu work with Tracy Van Brakle to update the events page with plugfests. 
    5. Actionuser-59b16 upload the UE emulator short/long term slide deck to the RSAC page.
    6. Action/ TOC provide feedback to Jack regarding the Cherry and D Release calendars on the Releases page
    7. Action/ Jinri Huang will point Thoralf Czichy to the appropriate WG specification times.  There are 3 trains for the specifications.  
    8. Actionuser-2057e update Vote Release Name page with the D release name options.
      1. you can now vote on name for release D here: https://wiki.o-ran-sc.org/display/REL/Vote+Release+Name

    9. ActionJinri Huang provide the TOC with the new O-RAN Alliance timeline.
    10. ActionTrishan de Lanerolle let us know the outcome of the ticket that John Keeney  opened regarding the Calendar synchronization.
      1. Should we set a single to a common time zone?
        1. projects use UTC.
          1. Find the best solution to the problem.
    11. Action/ PTLs update your project summaries with your sprint 2 status updates.  Be prepared to review your sprint 2 deliverables with the TOC.
    12. Action/ Jack will review Thoralf's How to request committer changes
    13. Actionuser-d3360 add the wiki link for SONAR to the Integration and Test wiki where people can easily find.
    14. Action/ user-59b16 set up a meeting with Viavi, O-RAN Alliance test committee (whoever is leading the test committee (David Orloff)), and the TOC.  
    15. Action/ William DIEGO  we need a test coordinator with the O-RAN test group so we can come up with a common plan between the test groups 
    16. Actionuser-d3360 add the link in the Integration and Test wiki to the SONAR instructions that you discussed on  TOC meeting.
    17. Action/ PTLs provide user-d3360  with your sprint 2 demos. 
  8. Standing Agenda Items (Brief Status of Ongoing Activities)
    1. Release Manager Trishan de Lanerolle /Release Planning: Weekly TOC Scheduling
      1. Project Bronze Release
        1. Rittwik - In the virtual F2F most of the projects met with their working group reviews.
        2. Jinri - Sees a gap in Cherry.  Overlap of WG.
          1. Jack - We have our ETE use cases that drive what we focus on in a release.  Right now we have two.  Traffic and self-test.  Think of it as something that is driving RAM functionality and OAM functionality.  Consider those and other tracks that are meaningful at pushing our community agenda.  The RSAC committee can provide the specifications that are changing in the window.  People that are interested please engage and help drive what are the important functionality.  C and D are important releases in delivering and driving value.  It is important that everyone get involved and the use cases in the C and D releases drive value to the O-RAN community participants and service providers otherwise we have to question whether we are going down the right path.  Please get involved and help us get there.  Let us see what we can do with the RSAC committee and see if our specs are frozen to make recommendations.
    2. Report out from PTL: Stand-Up & Report Out on Blockers - next week we will start to cover this list.  Are there any major items that anyone would like to raise to the TOC this week? 
      1. Matti Hiltunen RIC Applications (RICAPP)
        1. We are working on 6 xapps.  4 are traffic steering, 1 demo, 1 measurement campaign xapp.
          1. Is there a simulator requirement?
            1. Even if we decide to go with Viavi I don't think they committed to the E2 interface.
              1. The strategy was to get offline data.  If that is available we can replay the E2 simulator.
                1. Are there committed resources?
                  1. Alex - This is an open issue no one has volunteered.
                2. How can we help?  Who can step up and work with Alex to get this critical part done?  Is Viavi incremental to this need?  Is it available in this time frame? 
                  1. Not E2, we want the metric that the EU and DU can provide.  
                  2. RAN simulation data is critical.  We can work the E2 delivery in parallel.  
                  3. Is the simulator critically needed or not?
                    1. If we are using the RIC platform and we use the KPI.  We say we are using e2 then we need the simulator.  If we by pass e2 and kpi mon then we can populate the SDL layer.
                  4. Jack - yes it's needed.  Is there anyone on the call who can step up and help in this space?
      2. Thoralf Czichy RIC Platform (RIC) 
        1. note I updated the committer change process as per discussion last week: How to request committer changes.
      3. user-a934b O-RAN Centralized Unit (OCU) 
      4. Sachin Srivastava O-RAN Distributed Unit High (ODUHIGH)
      5. Zhimin Yuan O-RAN Distributed Unit Low (ODULOW)
      6. Martin Skorupski Operations and Maintenance (OAM)
      7. Alex Stancu Simulations (SIM)
      8. Xiaohua Zhang Infrastructure (INF)
      9. weichen ni Documentation (DOC)
      10. John Keeney Non-RealTime RIC (RAN Intelligent Controller) (NONRTRIC)
      11. (TBD) O-RAN Radio Unit (ORU)
    3. user-59b16 Requirements Software Architecture Committee
      1. David Kinsey, Rittwiki, RSAC team discussed one Dynamic (performance mgt.)  data collection set agenda pushed to ONAP.  It is the responsibility in SMO.  There is no SMO project. We are submitting. 
        1. Action user-59b16 add Martin Skorupski to conversations around dynamic data collection.
        2. Is there a cutoff point this week for your requirements because the ONAP G release gate is closing.
          1. Rittwik - Yes, we are working on the requirements.
          2. Action/ user-59b16 send @John Paul Lane from Ericsson the RSAC requirements.
      2. WLF files?  Zhimin Yuan we are in the process. 
      3. Will that happen once we do the integration
        1. We are preparing for the Bronze relase.
    4. user-d3360  Integration and Test
      1. Plan for Integration and Test 
        1. We have one development sprint left.  First we will do integration in two separate groups.  
        2. ODU Low and ODU high and
        3. OTF, OAM, NONRT RIC, Near RT RIC APP, SIM (Cloud), INF, O-DU LOW, O-DU High, SIM (Bare metal deployment)
        4. Integrated testing is lead by each PTL.  Every project is delivering multi-containers.  They are expected to do their own integration testing.
        5. Pairwise testing requires a need to interact.  Next level is our use case testing.  We will have a working session call and try to run the integrated testing together.
      2. How we will execute (be mindful of automated cleaning process) 
        1. We have a Nexus Staging Docker Registry (images on this registry only live for 30 days) after that an automated cleaner will remove.  There are ways to regenerate but keep the 30 day limit in mind.  
        2. merge jobs are automatically run weekly, which keeps images fresh in the staging registry :)
        3. There is a container tag.
        4. Nexus Release Docker Registry.  Images on release repo live "forever".  Images on release registry CANNOT be overwritten.
      3. Lusheng proposing to formally adopt semantic versioning for tagging released O-RAN docker containers.  After passing the component communicate through wiki, lists, and jira.
  9. New Agenda Items (New Business): New Items Submitted (+speaker) & Open Call to TOC For Additional Items. 
  10. Planning for Next Meeting
  11. Any Other Business (AOB) 
  12. Meeting Summary (resolutions, new action items, etc.)
  • No labels