Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. record-to-cloud. Note we change the recording format and I will post after the meeting in the meeting minutes a publicly available link like this one: link. This allows reading the audio transcript and fast-forward to places in the video that are highly-relevant. The transcript usually take a few hours before available. The video is available immediately.
  2. Regular items:
    1. Every time: Check that all large or XL commits of the last two weeks have also new unit tests. This is our policy. link-to-reviews (gerrit filter instructions // gerrit t-shirt-sizing).
      1. https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/c/ric-plt/lib/rmr/+/5748 OK
      2. https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/c/ric-plt/rtmgr/+/5743 NOK - Thoralf contacts committers. Bug report RIC-764.
      3. https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/c/ric-plt/lib/rmr/+/5681 OK
      4. https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/c/ric-plt/submgr/+/5640 OK
      5. https://gerrit.o-ran-sc.org/r/c/ric-plt/libe2ap/+/5617 OK as documentation commit
    2. every second time: Review code coverage stats.
  3. Snapshot (2021-03-16) jira_dawn_near_rt_ric.xlsx  // Always latest view from JIRA: Content of Dawn: 31 items planned: link and 15 "stretch goals": link
  4. RIC-671 (Alok) Who did originally pointed us to the “LF security” service? Which security issues it actually discovers that we do not already cover with Sonarcube? Does it actually address “container scans” for vulnerabilities? Does it cover scanning for including of vulnerable libraries or modules, like go modules? If we decide to go forward, we need to … (1) decide if we create a “meta project” entry similar to, e.g., CNCF? Like “O-RAN software community (O-RAN SC)” under which we then have separate projects, like, Near-RT RIC, which in turn will include a certain number of repositories?

  5. Initial discussion on alpine base images.
  6. RICAPP agenda: RICAPP Meetings.

...